Why I went “mental” at Oliver Letwin, MP

“Anger is a fuel. Anger is meant to be listened to, Anger is a voice, a shout, a plea, a demand. Anger is meant to be respected. Why? Because Anger is a map. Anger shows us where our boundaries are. It lets us see where we have been and let’s us know where we want to go. Anger points the way, not the finger. Anger is meant to be acted upon, not acted out.” Julia Cameron, 1993.

On Wednesday 20th January 2016, I attended an evening featuring a keynote speech by Mr Oliver Letwin, MP for Dorset West, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and responsible for the oversight of the Cabinet Office. I decided to use the opportunity to once again raise the call for mental health.


The event, hosted by Tory-funded ‘liberal conservative pressure group’ Bright Blue, was billed as a discussion focussing on “Opportunity For All”. When booking my tickets, I assumed (correctly) that the event was likely to involve examples of how the government was working to ensure equal opportunities for all people regardless of background. This was undoubtedly organised as a way of winning over middle ground voters, and maybe even as part of an effort to clean up Mr Letwin’s recently marred public image.

Ideology first

The 45 minute speech on conservative ideals was an eye opener to me, as I had never heard it straight from the source. If you aren’t aware, the concept is that we should all be striving to write the “story of our own lives” and that no-one should be held back from achieving their dreams and thus we “liberate the human spirit”. I agree, working hard and being ambitious is awesome, however, I find it even more liberating when I am also conscious to the many incredible “stories” being written around me, and indeed the greater story that we play a small part of. Conservatism, I discovered, is a little too ego-centric for my liking. I guess that makes me “left-leaning”?

Oliver Letwin speech

Takin’ it to the man

After this speech, I was the first of the audience to raise my hand to ask a question. I put it to Mr Letwin that the government was failing to deal with our rising mental health issues. Despite the government’s numerous promises for increased investment, all the evidence (below) is showing us that vital funding and support is not being made available to mental health services on the NHS, and that these issues are being largely neglected. That combined with the fact that the government has now stopped publishing how much it spends and where this spend is allocated (information only accessible via Freedom of Information requests), means it is now even harder to hold the government to account, when it shouldn’t be.

Mr Letwin replied typically (and disappointingly) by heralding all the great achievements done in the past for addressing mental health, and that there was still a lot more to do. You can listen to the full exchange here.

What is actually happening…

The ideas of “big society” and “opportunity for all” are noble, however they can only work in practice when we all have the same access to basic and necessary healthcare. After 6 years of Conservative led government, the signs are bleak where our NHS is concerned. Indeed, when telling us to focus on our individualistic aspirations, one has to ask where a collectivist institution like the NHS fits? Is that why we are seeing increasingly more of it sold off and privatised?

Just some of the depressing facts about our collective state of mental health:

  • The number of people becoming so ill they had to be detained under the Mental Health Act leapt by 10% in the past year.
  • The number of children being treated on adult mental health wards – something that the Mental Health Act rightly says should not happen at all – rose again in 2015.
  • Suicide is the highest it has been since 2001.
  • We are in the midst of a psychiatry recruitment crisis: there has been a 94% increase in vacant and unfilled consultant posts.

What the government is (or not) doing:

  • Government has pledged to spend £600million in mental health services. However, that is only a returning on spending levels we had in 2010.
  • NHS trusts’ income for mental health services has actually dropped by 8.25% in real terms over past five years.

  • The Government committed to £250m on child and adolescent mental health services or CAMHS for 2015/16, but the Government has admitted there will be a £77m shortfall on what they have pledged.

  • In 2014/15 funding for mental health trusts was cut by 20% more than that for other hospitals.
  • A King’s Fund report published in November 2015 found that just 14% of people felt that they received appropriate care in a crisis.

There is even mounting evidence that government policy is harming our collective mental health:

  • The Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health recently concluded that the programme of reassessing people on disability benefits using the Work Capability Assessment was independently associated with an increase in suicides, self-reported mental health problems and antidepressant prescribing.
  • 83% of people surveyed by the charity, Mind, reported that the Work Programme made their mental health condition worse.
  • The latest statistics reveal that less than 9% of people with mental health problems receiving Employment and Support Allowance have been helped into a job by the Work Programme.

I was also very saddened to read just yesterday the miserable story about Frances McCormack, the latest to take her own life after the added pressures brought about by the government’s controversial “bedroom tax”.

The I Newspaper

Accountability (lack of)

Lack of accountability is also a big problem: we still have no clarity on the promised government spending. In fact you have to use a Freedom of Information request to find out how much Clinical Commissioning Groups were allocating to mental health. The findings are alarming: 67% of CCGs spent less than 10% of their budget on mental health. This is despite mental health accounting for 23% of the total burden of disease.

In 2011/12 total investment in mental health dropped for the first time in a decade. Perhaps unsurprisingly, that same year the Government stopped publishing how much it invests in mental health.

It simply is not good enough. One has to wonder at what point will this government start taking our health seriously.


My question to you: Can individualistic/ capitalistic ideologies work when managing the public sector industries, like our National Health Service, where our quality of healthcare, safety and well-being (not profit) is the “bottom line”?

The latest results of a poll I started on YouGov:


I look forward to reading your comments below.


4 thoughts on “Why I went “mental” at Oliver Letwin, MP

  1. Thank you for your intervention at this meeting which described the shortfall in provision for mental ill health. I was a teacher, primary and secondary for nearly 40 years and during that time went to conferences concerning children’s mental health dis – ease. I was informed repeatedly that most children needing support were not receiving it and probably would not because of lack of specialist staff (funding for training, training places etc) and overall lack of awareness of mental health problems in young people. One specialist stated in a meeting that at least one in 10 schoolchildren (roughly 3 in each class in the 80s) needed some kind of mental health diagnosis and support and that this was well known in her profession.
    I certainly encountered children in my classrooms whose needs were not met, particularly quiet and undisruptive girls – disruptive boys make noise and were more likely to have statements of special needs. There was also increased incidence of autism which started to be more acknowledged by parents and teachers.
    I have read and heard in various media that there is exponential growth in self-harming, anorexia, bulimia etc. with increasing academic pressure in schools and, may I say, less experienced “fast-track” and aspirational teachers who are concerned to push through the governments academic targets to the detriment of students’ wellbeing.
    As a teacher I suffered from never- acknowledged mental health problems too and have heard of many others. The more conscientious the more suffering! (Now retired! Phew!)
    I had expected Letwin to be more pompous about his and his party’s achievements. Actually, I found his answer to you to be fairly measured. He acknowledged the shortfall in funding and the need for more to bring up to levels for physical health care (which is not enough either!). I think we have all, maybe even him? been horrified at the increasing number of suicides following Tory cuts and crass tabloid reporting in all media about “scroungers”. Keep up the pressure and well done for choosing this area of work which is so vital to the health of the nation. No point gaining qualifications and getting to Oxbridge if you jump off a balcony during Freshers’ week. Fact!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you Elizabeth for your reply. I am actually going into Teacher Training in September so I am trying to gain as much knowledge and experience in mental health issues so I feel I can provide the best support possible to my students. I feel there is always so much to learn, but that is what keeps me interested in mental health issues and education.
      I do agree that Mr Letwin’s reply was measured, but I feel the challenge (like with dealing with mental health patients) is the lack of empathy. I feel the government are responding to the crisis so terribly and slowly because they cannot understand the pressures that are mounting on people with mental health conditions from lower socio-economic backgrounds, who are being squeezed under these austerity policies.
      I absolutely will continue to make this case, as I believe in us understanding mental health and how to improve it may ultimately result in more people becoming compassionate in general. It’s a beautiful fight, totally worth every victory.
      Thank you once again for your feedback.


      1. Maybe this is way off, or potty even, or too simplistic, but traditionally people aren’t expected to take part in ultra-competitive scenarios without being fully and fairly provided with the necessary training/briefing/coping skills, eg: sporting competitions, warfare etc. If the Tories are throwing us into a ‘survival of the fittest’ lifestyle, should not the focus of education be on training young people to cope with the demands of life, rather than on – as it seems to me to be at the moment – encouraging competitive behaviour and rewarding success? Is it possible that a more humanist approach to educational style and content could pay dividends in adult life via the turning out of young people who have been forewarned, forearmed and helped to mature and develop ‘humanely’ during their school years? Could not a dose of compassionate genuine ‘reality training’ (rather than the artificial reality of ‘you got low SATs scores, so you’re a failure) help reduce the need for mopping up mental health with enormous budgets when (it seems) so many mental, and other, health problems are being created by the life we are pressured into living.
        I thought the whole thing about human progress was that we are moving away from ‘survival of the fittest’ towards the greatest happiness of the greatest number.
        I talk in ignorance as I haven’t had contact with the education system since I was a student myself in the mid-eighties and have no idea what they teach nowadays. I’m just making assumptions based on the “plus ca change…” principle.
        It seems to me that we are now a Do-It-Yourself society, unsupported as individuals, and subject to a whole punitive array of fines/penalties/punishments if we make cock-ups or simply don’t have the knowledge or capability or simply the time to compete.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Hi Rachel, thank you so much for your comment.

        I personally think you are absolutely spot on. I went to two very highly competitive schools before choosing my area of further study. I never really dropped the hard-working and competitive mindset that I believe I was conditioned into having but I can look at times in my life when I have been most dissatisfied with myself and they have been times when I feel I had failed, or let myself and my education down (completely ridiculous).

        It seems ironic to think that we may have evolved past the Darwinian ideology of “survival of the fittest”, but I think you are also right to point it out. Those who achieve the most in life may well work hard for it, but also attribute their success to luck and circumstance; even Mr Letwin said in his speech that he undoubtedly had huge advantages in life.

        We are all in this together 🙂 and I think you are right, by teaching children that working hard and achieving good grades is important. But it is certainly not the be all and end all, and failure is OK… would you let me teach your children, having said that?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s